The Asteroids Club » Archives » Reading: Entitlement Spending

Reading: Entitlement Spending

Help us add to our library by using the comment thread to suggest quality reading on entitlement spending. Keep in mind that you are looking for sources that people who don’t believe entitlement spending is a future risk might find convincing in moving them toward seeing the asteroid. Be sure to also assess the credibility of your source through the lens of someone less likely to agree with you (to convince a liberal, you might want to avoid citing Ann Coulter or Fox News). Emotional and intuitive arguments can be very effective, but evaluate them critically first – anything that demonizes or belittles those who resist the notion that entitlement spending has to be reformed will only serve to cement their resistance.

Posted under Conservative asteroids, Entitlement spending by liz 29.11.2010

Eric L

Planet Money: What Americans Agree On In The Fight Over The Deficit (Video)

Interesting talk on the American public’s views on how the deficit should be reduced. What’s somewhat surprising is just how much of the federal budget has strong Republican support — it isn’t just liberals who will be defending entitlement spending from cuts. Not that surprising in retrospect considering that conservatives tend to be older Americans who are on or soon will be on Social Security and Medicare.

Kevin Drum: The State of Pensions in America

Makes the case that liberals should support modest cuts in Social Security, because retirement incomes have grown over the last few decades while middle class incomes have stagnated.

NY Times: OK, You Fix The Budget

Includes a game where you can pick from a set of proposals to balance the 2030 budget.
- http://twitter.com/AsteroidsClub Asteroids Club
  
  These are fabulous! Thanks a million. Just what we’re looking for. We’re building a page on each asteroid and I’m adding these resources NOW. Will post page soon.
The Independent Whig

A few suggested resources about Entitlement Spending:

The Road to Serfdom
http://www.amazon.com/Road-Serfdom-Documents—Definitive-Collected/dp/0226320553/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1359382875&sr=1-1&keywords=the+road+to+serfdom

The Fatal Conceit
http://www.amazon.com/The-Fatal-Conceit-Socialism-Collected/dp/0226320669/ref=pd_sim_b_2

A Nation of Takers: America’s Entitlement Epidemic
http://www.amazon.com/Nation-Takers-Americas-Entitlement-Epidemic/dp/1599474352/ref=tmm_pap_title_0

The Heritage Foundation
http://www.heritage.org/issues/budget-and-spending/entitlements
http://www.heritage.org/federalbudget/entitlements

The Shocking Truth on Entitlements – U.S. News and World Report
http://www.usnews.com/opinion/articles/2012/12/19/the-shocking-truth-on-entitlements

I propose that entitlement spending is the effect of a deeper cause. The deeper cause is the mentality behind notions such as “social justice” and “positive liberty” which are characteristic of the three-foundation morality of liberalism, which emphasizes the moral foundation of “care” above all others.

Jonathan Haidt described the concept of positive liberty in his lecture “When Compassion Leads to Sacrilege” which he gave at the Center for Compassion and Altruism Research and Education (CCARE) at Stanford University.
Video available here: http://vimeo.com/24606251

Here’s a quote from the lecture: “The trick here is to understand that there are two kinds of liberty at play in our political discourse. There’s negative liberty which is the absence of obstacles which block human action. This is the common sense understanding of liberty. And then there’s a new notion that developed in the twentieth century, especially in Europe called positive liberty, which is, well, it’s all well and good to say that people should have a right to do as the please but if you can’t get an education then you don’t really have a right to do as you please. And if you can’t get health care, well, you’re not healthy enough to take advantage of the opportunities of our society. Sooo, we have to give people, as rights, education, welfare, food, a right to a job, all these rights that they enshrine in Europe. And that is known as positive liberty. It’s really crucial to recognize that the top one [negative liberty] is deep, emotional, obvious, everyone gets it, the bottom one [positive liberty] is a cerebral concept developed by philosophers gradually, has very little emotional resonance. You probably understood my description but it doesn’t rankle. Violations of it don’t rankle in the way that violations of negative liberty do.”

Other books and articles which explore this idea:

A Conflict of Visions: Ideological Origins of Political Struggles
http://www.amazon.com/Conflict-Visions-Ideological-Political-Struggles/dp/0465002056/ref=pd_sim_b_8

Here’s a quote from the book: “Central to the concept of social justice is the notion that individuals are entitled to some share of the wealth produced by society, simply by virtue of being members of that society, and irrespective of any individual contributions made or not made to the production of that wealth.”

The Mysticism of ‘Social Justice’
http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/304176/mysticism-social-justice-thomas-sowell

The Quest for Cosmic Justice
http://www.amazon.com/Quest-Cosmic-Justice-Thomas-Sowell/dp/0684864630

Expanding on Haidt’s theme about Positive Liberty, I believe that “Liberty, Equality, Justice, and Fairness Mean Different Things in Different Moral Matrices”
http://theindependentwhig.com/2012/02/26/liberty-equality-justice-and-fairness-mean-different-things-in-different-moral-matrices/

Expanding on Haidt’s theme of Altruism, I believe entitlement spending is an example of what Barbara Oakley called “Pathological Altruism” in her book by that title:
http://www.amazon.com/Pathological-Altruism-Barbara-Oakley/dp/0199738572

A quote from Oakley: “I have come to believe,” she explains, “that, for my fellow liberals, empathy, altruism and caring for others have become a kind of secular religion that is actually harmful, because it can be used as a cover for nefarious, corrupt and self-serving action. People can be blinded by their caring into doing things that hurt those they hope to help. Like communism, altruism is often seemingly beneficent”
http://www.barbaraoakley.com/files/Oakley_Times_Higher_Education_Supplement.pdf

The Independent Whig
http://theindependentwhig.com/
- http://twitter.com/AsteroidsClub Asteroids Club
  
  Thanks, we’re using a number of these resources on our main resource page on entitlements. It’ll be up shortly. Appreciate the assist. We probably won’t look at the deeper causes/philosophical underpinning because our goal is to get people to agree on the factual nature of the asteroid coming toward us – that’s a big enough lift in the current political environment. Anyone having been told that broadly their philosophy is flawed becomes more defensive and less likely to listen.
Pingback: The Elephant in the Room | The Independent Whig()

November 2010
M	T	W	T	F	S	S
« Oct		Dec »
1	2	3	4	5	6	7
8	9	10	11	12	13	14
15	16	17	18	19	20	21
22	23	24	25	26	27	28
29	30

Asteroids Club Reading Room

Recent Blog Posts

Make Asteroids Club Shop at CafePress

Reading: Entitlement Spending

Categories

Archives

Archives

Archives